Bug 122519
Summary: | [PATCH] /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.* is not owned by package | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael> | ||||
Component: | libgcrypt | Assignee: | Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2004-05-05 21:09:16 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Michael Schwendt
2004-05-05 13:42:34 UTC
Created attachment 99989 [details]
patch for spec file
The link is created and managed by ldconfig. I'm inclined to let ldconfig continue to handle it, so marking wontfix. teher could be a case made for having those files as %ghost... * Nalin, I do respect your decision, but it is a bad one, since not including the link creates an inconsistency between what $ rpm -q --provides libgcrypt libgcrypt.so.11 reports and what is included in the package actually. In particular, this makes it difficult to check for damaged packages with "rpm -V" (as what applications link against is not included in the package!) * %ghost'ing the link would work, too, but would require more effort at the spec file level. * Btw, "rpm -qf /usr/lib/*.so.?" reveals that indeed the majority of packages include these links. |