Bug 122693
Summary: | correction for Red Hat's release history descriptions | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Web Site | Reporter: | Matt <2lprbe78> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Karsten Wade <kwade> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Web Development <webdev> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | current | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://fedora.redhat.com/about/history/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-03-06 18:34:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matt
2004-05-07 00:33:33 UTC
i have a bugzilla bug in for adding a fedora website section... no one seems to be listening, grr I assume you mean bug:109938? Yea, +1 from me. Would save the webdev team a lot of time having to re-assign fedora website bugs to Tammy or other. Thanks for bringing bug #109938 to my attention. I just closed it because the fedora-docs component has since been added. I'll look into this issue and get back to you. I want to verify with someone who was around during the Rembrandt and Picasso releases before I change it just to be safe. The page this refers to no longer exists. Also, the Fedora Project isn't really trying to keep a comprehensive history of Red Hat Linux. Perhaps this is something that should be maintained in Wikipedia? I'll close this bug as CANTFIX because of the passage of time, change in content, and inability to verify if the mistake still exists anywhere. If there is an effort started to do a comprehensive history, this bug report will likely turn up in research. |