Bug 122727
Summary: | Systems Logs (/usr/bin/redhat-logviewer) does not open. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tyler Schuckman <tschuckman> |
Component: | redhat-logviewer | Assignee: | Paul Nasrat <nobody+pnasrat> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-04 14:51:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tyler Schuckman
2004-05-07 14:32:50 UTC
I can not reproduce this in FC1. What versions of redhat-logviewer and python are you running? Can you start any of the other config tools that are written in Python? I don't know how to tell what version of redhat-logviewer I'm using. Whatever came with the Fedora Core 1 cds that came with Wideopen magazine. Python 2.2.3 I don't know what other config tools are written in Python. I can open every other tool listed under the System Tools. Please open a shell prompt like GNOME terminal and issue the following 2 commands: rpm -q redhat-logviewer rpm -q python This will tell you what versions. Did you upgrade Python after installing FC1 or are you using the same version that came with the Wide Open Magazine CDs? redhat-logviewer-0.9.3-6 python-2.2.3-7 I didn't upgrade python, but I did upgrade libpng in the course of a bugzilla install. Maybe it is a libpng problem? Yes. It looks like a libpng problem because I can not reproduce this error on an FC1 system with these package versions. Where did you get the libpng package you upgraded to? Closed due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen with the info requested in Comment #5 |