Bug 12277
Summary: | subpackages with different arch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | gerald |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-06-14 16:51:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
gerald
2000-06-14 16:51:06 UTC
By design, rpm permits only one architecture per spec file parse. That means that you are forbidden to have noarch sub-packages of a arch specific package. Group tag is similarly (i.e. by design) required. Why does rpm permit only one architecture per spec file parse? this makes absolutely no sense to me! I have a package which has ~100MB. About 60MB thereof is additional documentation. I want to split off the additional documentation since it eats up space and is by no means neccesary to run the software. Since the doc is "noarch" why should'nt I be able to tell rpm that it is!? Again this "feature" makes NO sense to me. Please change it. |