Bug 122806

Summary: 5 * array subscript out of range
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: d.binderman
Component: xorg-x11Assignee: Mike A. Harris <mharris>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-05-10 06:02:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description d.binderman 2004-05-08 09:03:48 UTC
Description of problem:

I just tried to compile Core2 Test3 package xorg-x11-6.7.0-0.5

The compiler said

1.

gamma_state.c(1600): warning #175: subscript out of range

The source code is

        WRITE(gmesa->buf, TxBaseAddr12, curTex->TextureBaseAddr[12]);

Suspect TextureBaseAddr[12] doesn't exist.

2.

i830_texstate.c(1567): warning #175: subscript out of range

The source code is

      pipe_num = imesa->TexBlendColorPipeNum[3];

Suspect TexBlendColorPipeNum[3] doesn't exist.

3.

i830_texstate.c(1568): warning #175: subscript out of range
i830_texstate.c(1570): warning #175: subscript out of range

Duplicates.

4.

xedit.c(270): warning #175: subscript out of range

The source code is

    scan_types[5]       = KEYWORD("ALPHA-NUMERIC");

but

static LispObj *scan_types[5];




Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2004-05-08 09:45:08 UTC
It's more efficient if bugs of this nature are filed into the
upstream X.org bugzilla.  You can file a report in the X.org
bugzilla at http://bugs.freedesktop.org against the "xorg"
component.

If you paste a URL to your upstream report here, Red Hat can also
track the upstream bug report if you wish.

Thanks in advance.

Comment 2 d.binderman 2004-05-09 08:16:11 UTC
Thanks for your kind offer, but its more efficient for me
to only report each bug once to Redhat.

Feel free to duplicate it anywhere you like, just so long as
the bug gets fixed. 

Comment 3 Mike A. Harris 2004-05-10 06:02:57 UTC
There are no specific documented problems being reported in this
report, and a quick look at the above does not indicate any critical
issues that may be caused by these problems, so the proper path
for these type of low priority issues to be resolved is through
upstream channel via X.org bugzilla.

Once these issues are reported upstream, and the upstream URL
pasted here, we will review the upstream bug report occasionally
to see if there's been any changes, and if any of the upstream
fixes seem safe and sane, we may consider to include them in
our tree as well.  Alternatively, if someone attaches unified
diffs to this report containing fixes for the problems reported
above, we will review them for consideration as well.

All issues of this nature should be reported directly to X.org in
the future, unless there are known reproduceable software failures
caused by it, or system lockups, crashes, security vulnerabilities
or other similar critical issues.

Closing bug as WONTFIX.