Bug 1229288

Summary: Yahoo.com and AOL DMARC reject policies cripples Mailman-2.1.12 - update to newer release
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Jan Kurik <jkurik>
Component: mailmanAssignee: Jan Kaluža <jkaluza>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Frantisek Sumsal <fsumsal>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 7.1CC: amahdal, byrnejb, cww, eric.eisenhart, fsumsal, jherrman, jkaluza, jorton, jscotka, marc, orion, ovasik, rdieter
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: mailman-2.1.15-20.el7_1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, it was impossible to configure Mailman in a way that Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) would recognize Sender alignment for Domain Key Identified Mail (DKIM) signatures. Consequently, Mailman list subscribers that belonged to a mail server with a "reject" policy for DMARC, such as yahoo.com or AOL.com, were unable to receive Mailman forwarded messages from senders residing in any domain that provided DKIM signatures. With this update, domains with a "reject" DMARC policy are recognized correctly, and Mailman list administrators are able to configure the way these messages are handled. As a result, after a proper configuration, subscribers now correctly receive Mailman forwarded messages in this scenario.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1107652 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-23 09:12:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1107652    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jan Kurik 2015-06-08 11:39:53 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #1107652 and has been proposed
to be backported to 7.1 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-23 09:12:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1153.html