Bug 1229730
| Summary: | dnf.subject.Subject() does not honour epoch | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Mráka <mmraka> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | gerd, jmracek, jsilhan, jzeleny, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, tim.lauridsen, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-12-02 15:17:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1286877 | ||
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23 IIRC we have the bug report not recognizing the package with epoch in install cmd (can't find the bug now). This is the cause. This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Jarda, has this bug been fixed with the latest Subject/Selector changes? Michael sorry, but latest selectors changes did not solve the issue, but this PR YEEEES: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/662 |
Description of problem: dnf.subject.Subject() returns packages with different epochs even if epoch is specified Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-1.0.0-1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. have a repo with two packages of the same name and different epoch, e.g foo-0:1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm and foo-1:1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm 2. dnf list foo-0:1.0-1.fc22 Actual results: # dnf list foo-0:1.0-1.fc22 Available Packages foo.noarch 1.0-1.fc22 foo foo.noarch 1:1.0-1.fc22 foo Expected results: # dnf list foo-0:1.0-1.fc22 Available Packages foo.noarch 1.0-1.fc22 foo Additional info: -> subj = dnf.subject.Subject('foo-0:1.0-1.fc22') -> pkgs = subj.get_best_query(self.base.sack) (Pdb) pkgs.run() [<hawkey.Package object id 46019, foo-1.0-1.fc22.noarch, foo>, <hawkey.Package object id 46020, foo-1:1.0-1.fc22.noarch, foo>]