Bug 1230324

Summary:	Update python-saharaclient to 0.9.0
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	Luigi Toscano <ltoscano>
Component:	python-saharaclient	Assignee:	Elise Gafford <egafford>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Luigi Toscano <ltoscano>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.0 (Kilo)	CC:	egafford, jschluet, kbasil, matt, mimccune, yeylon
Target Milestone:	ga
Target Release:	7.0 (Kilo)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-saharaclient-0.9.0-1.el7ost	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-08-05 13:25:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Luigi Toscano 2015-06-10 16:26:42 UTC

Description of problem:


One of the new features supported for Kilo is job-types support. Support for that was merged post-0.8.0 and available in 0.9.0.

Upstream suggests that 0.9.0 is the preferred version:

http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-sahara/%23openstack-sahara.2015-06-09.log.html#t2015-06-09T12:22:20

Moreover, upstream suggests the usage of integration testing from master, and they do depend on 0.9.0.

Only possible drawback: test-requirements.txt of sahara from stable/kilo depends on: 
python-saharaclient>=0.8.0,<0.9.0

This is (as mentioned) not a problem for scenario tests (master is used) but unit tests could be affected (even if the changes introduced in the clients does not seem to be relevant).

Comment 4 Luigi Toscano 2015-06-16 11:48:47 UTC

The new packages is a drop-in replacement for 0.8.0 and it appears to work with no regressions. The new job-type-list command is available and working.

python-saharaclient-0.9.0-1.el7ost.noarch

Tested against:
openstack-sahara-engine-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch
openstack-sahara-api-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch
openstack-sahara-common-2015.1.0-2.el7ost.noarch

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-05 13:25:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015:1548