Bug 1230500

Summary: Requires on glibc-headers should be removed.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Carlos O'Donell <codonell>
Component: smp_utilsAssignee: Dan HorĂ¡k <dan>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 26CC: dan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: smp_utils-0.98-8.fc27 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-09 09:19:23 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1230505    

Description Carlos O'Donell 2015-06-11 04:22:28 UTC
The devel package should not Requires on glibc-headers.

The development libraries and headers will be used by developers via BuildRequires, but along with BuildRequires: gcc or BuildRequires: gcc-gfortran or BuildRequires: gcc-c++ to be able to compile their code.

The compiler will ensure the standard libraries and headers are installed to make sure the library headers are complete e.g. that #include <stdio.h> works.

There is no need to Require: glibc-headers. The reason I'm asking for the removal of glibc-headers is that the package may or may not go away in the future depending on sub-package restructuring, and it is not needed.

Note: The spec file looks like a copy of the sg3_utils spec file with some changes missing. You may wish to update references to sg3_utils to smp_utils instead.

Comment 1 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:01:38 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

Comment 2 Carlos O'Donell 2016-06-08 14:41:46 UTC
Any progress on removing the unused BuildRequires on glibc-headers?

Comment 3 Jan Kurik 2016-07-26 04:10:53 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 25 development cycle.
Changing version to '25'.

Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2017-02-28 09:45:09 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle.
Changing version to '26'.