Bug 123124
Summary: | Crazy and confusing item/application naming scheme for main menu | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Favia <michael.favia> |
Component: | redhat-menus | Assignee: | Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-01-22 16:04:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michael Favia
2004-05-12 18:34:37 UTC
Is the currect practice of naming something by both the project name and the generic name a good compromise? For example Firefox Web Browser and Evince Document Viewer. Note that the name is defined in the .desktop file of the package, so to suggest fixes to specific applications file bugs against them. This report targets the FC3 or FC4 products, which have now been EOL'd. Could you please check that it still applies to a current Fedora release, and either update the target product or close it ? Thanks. Unfortunately i use another distribution for my desktops these days and use FCX exclusively as a web server product so i don't have desktops installed on them. I don't know if this is still an issue or if this was ever a real issue for other people besides myself. Marking as DEFERRED. |