Bug 1231350

Summary:	RFA: gnumeric
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk>
Component:	gnumeric	Assignee:	Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel7	CC:	hdegoede, huzaifas, steve.cleveland
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-05-15 09:20:30 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dimitri Maziuk 2015-06-12 19:07:22 UTC

(not sure why 1136845 is not an RFA, looks like it's never been touched so maybe we'll have better luck with this one)

Please build gnumeric for EPEL7. I see there's goffice08 already in epel-testing and according to this: http://osdir.com/ml/gnumeric-list/2015-01/msg00017.html F21 RPMs "just work". (I'm about to test that.)

I sometimes need a usable spreadsheet and the way libreopen#$%!'s been going lately, it hardly qualifies anymore. :-(

Comment 1 Steve Cleveland 2016-03-03 21:26:09 UTC

I second this.

Comment 2 Dimitri Maziuk 2016-03-03 21:43:26 UTC

F21 RPM does actually "just work", at least for simple things I do in gnumeric.

Comment 3 Steve Cleveland 2016-03-03 21:46:19 UTC

I don't use Fedora though.  Now I have to setup a custom repository and keep that package updated.  Would be nice to have it integrated into EPEL.  If the fedora package just works, I assume it would be an easy rebuild in EPEL?  Perhaps I'm wrong.

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2016-05-15 09:20:30 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1136845 ***