Bug 123176

Summary: [RFE] Need new perl rpm release that fixes threaded memory leak
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Marc Wiartrowski <wia>
Component: perlAssignee: Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0CC: poelstra
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-881 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-12-20 14:56:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 154449, 168424    

Description Marc Wiartrowski 2004-05-13 16:34:10 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b)
Gecko/20040316

Description of problem:
Would like a new perl rpm that addresses the shared.xs memory leak
when using threads.  I believe it was fixed atleast by version 5.8.2

Don't want to have to compile my own version of perl for the Enterprise
version.

-thanks

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.0-88.4

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
NA

Additional info:

Comment 1 Suzanne Hillman 2005-04-11 20:13:15 UTC
Internal RFE bug #154449 entered; will be considered for future releases.

Comment 2 Jason Vas Dias 2005-11-10 00:00:53 UTC
Sorry for the delay in processing this bug .

By "shared.xs memory leak" are you referring to this perl bug :
   #24061: shared array memory leak in 5.8.1
   ( http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24061 )
?

If so, the patch which fixes it ( #21530 ) has now been applied to the 
next RHEL-3 perl-5.8.0-90.2 version.

This bug should probably have been treated as a normal bug report rather than
an enhancement request - it is a bug that perl-5.8.0's threads implementation
leaks memory, and a request to fix this is not an enhancement request.

Comment 3 Marc Wiartrowski 2005-11-14 13:58:12 UTC
Yes, this looks like our problem.  -thanks

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-12-20 14:56:41 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-881.html