Bug 1234598
Summary: | Early grace period expiry with NFSv4.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Chuck Lever <chuck.lever> |
Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Yongcheng Yang <yoyang> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | bfields, eguan, fs-qe |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | nfs-utils-1.3.0-0.12.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 04:29:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Chuck Lever
2015-06-22 18:56:45 UTC
commit d479ad3adb0671c48d6fbf3e36bd52a31159c413 Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton> Date: Fri Sep 19 11:03:45 2014 -0400 nfsdcltrack: update schema to v2 I can reproduce upstream. I think the NLM grace period is interfering here--this patch helps in the cases I'm testing: http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=143889261918791 Whoops, no, the problem is with my testcase, apologies. It's sm-notify that's responsible for ending the NLM grace period early, and sm-notify is only run after a full reboot. (Well, it runs when you restart nfs-server, but there's logic in it to exit immediately if it sees it's already run.) So the best test is probably to do a full reboot of the server. In the good cases the client's touch should hang during the reboot, but finish executing soon after nfsd comes back up. In the bad cases, it should take about another 90 seconds after nfsd comes back up. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2196.html |