Bug 1235561

Summary: ocaml dependencies should include implementation hashes for native code
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Component: ocamlAssignee: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 26CC: c.david86, rjones
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-05-29 12:00:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/stdlib.cmxa
none
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/stdlib.cma
none
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/printf.cmx
none
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/gettextBase.cmxa none

Description Richard W.M. Jones 2015-06-25 07:49:37 UTC
Created attachment 1042988 [details]
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/stdlib.cmxa

Description of problem:

For background, see:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2015-06/msg00173.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235183#c2

Currently we generate dependencies based on the hash of the
interface of OCaml modules.  eg:
ocaml(Printf) = eb49a17645c5ea2dd298430a3c986186

For native code, there is also a hash generated on the
implementation of the module, and hash mismatched can also
cause the infamous "inconsistent assumptions" error, so we
should generate dependencies based on those too, eg:
ocaml(Printf.cmx) = 04c9d8650cdb1dfb88a0138d7aa7f627

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ocaml 4.02.2

Additional information:

See attached output from ocamlobjinfo for various files.

Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2015-06-25 07:50:06 UTC
Created attachment 1042989 [details]
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/stdlib.cma

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2015-06-25 07:50:45 UTC
Created attachment 1042990 [details]
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/printf.cmx

Comment 3 Richard W.M. Jones 2015-06-25 07:51:11 UTC
Created attachment 1042991 [details]
ocamlobjinfo /usr/lib64/ocaml/gettextBase.cmxa

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 13:55:05 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-24 11:57:31 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2017-02-28 09:45:46 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle.
Changing version to '26'.

Comment 7 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-03 08:49:24 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '26'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 8 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-29 12:00:11 UTC
Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26
is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any
further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.