Bug 123579

Summary: fonts.conf conflict between s390 and s390x versions
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Tony Naccarato <tony.naccarato>
Component: fontconfigAssignee: Owen Taylor <otaylor>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 19:03:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 116727    

Description Tony Naccarato 2004-05-19 13:57:00 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2)
Gecko/20040308

Description of problem:
I am trying to install the 32 bit (s390) version of fontconfig i.e.
fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390.rpm on a 64 bit machine which already has
fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390x.rpm installed. I need to do this to satisfy
dependancies of a 32-bit app which I am trying to run.

A conflict is reported by rpm when I do this.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run "rpm -ihv fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390x.rpm"
2. Run "rpm -ihv fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0.s390.rpm"

    

Actual Results:  rpm reports :

   file /etc/fonts/fonts.conf from install of fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0 
   conflicts with file from package fontconfig-2.2.1-8.0

Expected Results:  It should be possible to install both the s390 and
s390x versions on the same machine.

Additional info:

When I diff the fonts.conf file from the s390 and s390x packages the
only difference is:

24c24
< <!-- Font directory list configured on Wed Mar 10 12:17:41 EST 2004 -->
---
> <!-- Font directory list configured on Wed Mar 10 12:17:45 EST 2004 -->

Since this is just a comment - can it be made to be the same for both
architectures please?

Comment 1 Seth Vidal 2004-06-21 23:00:19 UTC
Ditto this on rhel3 x86_64


Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-07-22 20:55:35 UTC
This is bug 118182.

Comment 3 Owen Taylor 2004-08-03 22:57:05 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122793 ***

Comment 4 Tony Naccarato 2004-08-04 12:11:13 UTC
What is the relevance of bug 122793 "fatal error communicating with
the server - Status Code: 404" to this bug? Are you sure you typed in
the right duplicate bug number?

Comment 5 Owen Taylor 2004-08-04 14:51:36 UTC
Sigh. bug 122973.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122973 ***

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 19:03:18 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.