Bug 1236395
Summary: | rebase of fence agents | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Marek Grac <mgrac> |
Component: | fence-agents | Assignee: | Oyvind Albrigtsen <oalbrigt> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | cluster-qe <cluster-qe> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | cfeist, cluster-maint, klaas, mjuricek, oalbrigt, rduda |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | fence-agents-4.2.1-9.el7 | Doc Type: | Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-10-30 07:49:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marek Grac
2015-06-28 14:24:07 UTC
Thanks to MITM regression tests, we should be able to easily update to current version of fence agents. Features that are the most important and requires a lot of changes in core components: * action validate-all to check if entered arguments are enough for fence agent * integration of MITM regression testing. After the rebase will be package fence-agents-amt available for rhel? As it is already present in Fedora. Many devices support AMT these days. @Radek: Rebase itself will not add new subpackages. We plan to add a support for Intel AMT (rhbz#1296201) but we are waiting for updated version of openwsman (rhbz#1296198). Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3031 with this update you removed the timeout option from fence_ipmilan again ( that was readded in bz#1257137 ), is that on purpose? |