|Summary:||dnf local plugin does not work by default because nothing creates /var/lib/dnf/plugins/local|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Chris Siebenmann <cks-rhbugzilla>|
|Status:||CLOSED DUPLICATE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||24||CC:||billcrawford1970, jkadlcik, jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, vmukhame|
|Target Milestone:||---||Keywords:||Reopened, Triaged|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2016-11-30 10:57:26 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Chris Siebenmann 2015-06-29 21:46:24 UTC
Description of problem: If you install python-dnf-plugins-extras-local, the plugin doesn't actually work because nothing creates the default /var/lib/dnf/plugins/local directory that it attempts to save RPMs to. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): python-dnf-plugins-extras-local-0.0.8-1.fc22.noarch dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22.noarch How reproducible: Totally. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install a fresh Fedora 22 machine 2. do 'dnf install python-dnf-plugins-extras-local' 3. use dnf to install some package you don't already have installed 4. at the end of the install, dnf will report: local: '/var/lib/dnf/plugins/local' is not a directory Actual results: The local plugin prints an error and does not save a copy of the RPMs you just installed. Expected results: The local plugin saves RPMs to /var/lib/dnf/plugins/local. Additional info: Note that neither /var/lib/dnf/plugins nor /var/lib/dnf/plugins/local is created.
Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2015-06-30 16:46:08 UTC
Yes, my fault. Will fix ASAP.
Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 15:07:28 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Comment 3 Chris Siebenmann 2016-07-19 15:54:49 UTC
This remains a bug in Fedora 24. It reproduces exactly as it did in Fedora 22.
Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-07-21 12:41:18 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.