Bug 1237194

Summary: release field does not include dist tag
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kamil Páral <kparal>
Component: xhtml1-dtdsAssignee: Daniel Veillard <veillard>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: veillard, ville.skytta
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: xhtml1-dtds-1.0-20020801.13.fc23 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-02 13:04:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1237153    

Description Kamil Páral 2015-06-30 14:07:41 UTC 
Description of problem:
This package does not include a dist tag (e.g. '.fc23') in its release field, even though it is mandatory according the packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag

Our automated testing efforts are beginning to rely on having a dist tag in RPM file names:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-June/thread.html#10693

Please adjust the package spec file and add '%{?dist}' at the end of the release field. Do this for all supported Fedora releases.

It is not necessary to build a new package version immediately, but it should be prepared in the spec file so that a new package build in the future will contain the dist tag.

Thank you.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xhtml1-dtds-0:1.0-20020801.12.noarch
Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2015-07-02 09:26:09 UTC 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10269549
Comment 2 Kamil Páral 2015-07-02 11:48:00 UTC 
Thank you. Could you please also adjust the spec file for f21 and f22 branches? You don't need to create a new build, this is just to make sure it won't get forgotten once we need one.
Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2015-07-02 12:23:57 UTC 
I don't intend to. Considering the nature of this package it's almost certain that no updates to it will be shipped to < F-23 and I don't like the suggested "just in case" stray commits myself.
Comment 4 Kamil Páral 2015-07-02 13:04:15 UTC 
In that case I'm closing the bug again.