Bug 123884
Summary: | (RFE) allow user to specify RPM package version to install to yum | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe> |
Component: | yum | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i586 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-06-10 02:14:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sitsofe Wheeler
2004-05-21 11:05:41 UTC
it's not possible to specify a version one the command line in yum. That sounds like WONTFIX to me. You can always download a specific version of a package and install using rpm. Why was this closed WORKSFORME? If you add the jpackage yum source and then try and install the jpackage ant I'm sure you won't find it doesn't WORKFORYOU! It sounds like you mean WONTFIX... Yes, it is possible to use RPM by hand to do this but solving the dependency tree by hand wasn't fun (I downloaded the RPM, tried to install, found the requires line, found more RPMs, tried to install etc). I'm fairly sure apt for RPM did allow you to specify versions and without it it's a real pain for jpackage users. it is something that I am working on for a future release but it won't be immediate and it's not in the 2.0.X timeline at all. the reality is that handling specific version selection AND globs is incredibly difficult to parse sanely, especially when you're not selecting from a commandline and counting on the shell matching but when you're selecting from a remote repository and then must do the 'best thing' given what you're asked to do. Thanks for the explanation Seth. Can't enhancement or (RFE) bugs stick around indefinitely? I'm not asking for it to be added in the next year but having a bug open means that other people can be pointed at this one / or closing it WONTFIX acknowledges that yum doesn't do this rather than brushing it under the carpet and saying it's not a problem. you can put an RFE in yum bugzilla, then, not in red hat's. https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/ |