Bug 1239657

Summary: lpairs: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component: lpairsAssignee: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: mszpak, rc040203
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-20 14:11:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1239338    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Dennis Gilmore 2015-07-05 21:04:56 UTC
Your package lpairs failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10110759

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2015-07-05 21:04:57 UTC
Created attachment 1047286 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Dennis Gilmore 2015-07-05 21:04:58 UTC
Created attachment 1047287 [details]
root.log

Comment 3 Dennis Gilmore 2015-07-05 21:04:58 UTC
Created attachment 1047288 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 13:37:22 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

Comment 5 Ralf Corsepius 2015-07-20 13:53:01 UTC
Taking.

Old c11-incompatible code-base. Appending -std=gnu89 to CFLAGS.

Comment 7 Marcin Zajaczkowski 2015-07-20 15:15:10 UTC
Thanks Ralf for a workaround. I've already talked with upstream and I have locally a patch which makes the code compatible with GCC 5. But first I need to test it with both GCC 4 and GCC 5 and I will do it when come back from my holiday (end of August).