Bug 124099

Summary:	Nit-picky wording change
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Academy	Reporter:	Johnathan Kupferer <kupferer>
Component:	RHA030 Curriculum	Assignee:	Bowe Strickland <bowe>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Bowe Strickland <bowe>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	2.0	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://academy.redhat.com/courses/rha030-2.0/rha030_usersgroups_users.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-01-07 17:31:08 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Johnathan Kupferer 2004-05-24 03:09:53 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1)
Gecko/20031114

Description of problem:
RHA033 -> Workbook 3 -> Chapter 1 -> Key Concepts

I know, this is picky, but maybe:

"Fundamentally, a user is just an integer user id (uid)"

Just sounds a little dehumanizing.  How about:

"To the Linux kernel, a user is just an integer user id (uid)"

or

"In Linux based operating systems, a user is just an integer user id
(uid)"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Visit the URL

Additional info: