Bug 1241135
| Summary: | allow builddep to process file regardless of filename | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Milan Kubík <mkubik> |
| Component: | dnf-plugins-core | Assignee: | Michael Mráka <mmraka> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | amarecek, ffesti, jfilak, jsilhan, mluscon, mmraka, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rholy, tim.lauridsen, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-08-15 02:13:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Milan Kubík
2015-07-08 14:19:37 UTC
I don't agree with the "regression" tag since the documentation never promised that it should work. I've got your point. You're probably dealing with chicken-egg problem. You don't have satisfied dependencies so you can't generate spec file from spec.in. We had these issues in our projects too but we have solved it with scripts and tito. The problem is the spec.in is not a valid spec file which is parsed by rpm API - rpm.spec(<file>), rpm.ds(spec.sourceHeader, 'requires'). I'd advice you to figure out how to fix it in your project setup first. Parsing invalid file seems to me hacky. What's your view on that Florian? How can RPM handle parsing of partial spec files? Our current 'hack' around it is something like awk '/BuildRequires/ { print $2 }' <file.spec.in> | xargs dnf install -y
This has different issues though sometimes.
dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc23,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 23. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc23,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc23 dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 Package dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22, dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22, hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22 dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22 hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13162/dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22,dnf-1.1.0-1.fc22,hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22 then log in and leave karma (feedback). dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc22, hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc22, dnf-1.1.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. dnf-plugins-core-0.1.10-1.fc23, hawkey-0.6.0-1.fc23, dnf-1.1.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. > What's your view on that Florian? How can RPM handle parsing of partial spec files?
Poorly!
|