Bug 1243653

Summary: Update RHEV-RHGS Guide for RHGS 3.1
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: SATHEESARAN <sasundar>
Component: doc-Configuring_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization_with_RHGSAssignee: Rakesh <rghatvis>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: SATHEESARAN <sasundar>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.1CC: asriram, asrivast, rghatvis, sasundar
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: RHGS 3.1.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1202842    

Description SATHEESARAN 2015-07-16 03:00:49 UTC 
Document URL:
--------------
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3/html-single/Configuring_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization_with_Red_Hat_Storage/index.html 

Section Number and Name: 
------------------------
Not specific

Describe the issue: 
-------------------
'Configuring RHEV with RHS' doc needs to be updated for RHGS 3.1 release

Suggestions for improvement: 
-----------------------------
1. Few of the screenshots should be updated
2. Update compatibility matrix

Additional information: 
-----------------------
I will be providing additional information - related to screenshots and compatibility matrix
Comment 1 SATHEESARAN 2015-07-20 08:44:47 UTC 
Section - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Storage/3/html-single/Configuring_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization_with_Red_Hat_Storage/index.html#Compatible_Versions

Section Number - 5.1

In Table 5.1 add a row as follows :
3.1         - 3.5

In Table 5.2 add a row as follows :
3.1         - 3.4
3.0 Update4 - 3.4


Please add the above lines in the guide
Comment 3 SATHEESARAN 2015-07-22 15:17:37 UTC 
Thanks Rakesh.
The content looks good to me.

Marking this bug as VERIFIED