Bug 124379
Summary: | suggesting more file systems to pick from... | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | daniel <theverylittleone> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Dave Jones <davej> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2 | CC: | pfrields, theverylittleone |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-11-03 03:49:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
daniel
2004-05-26 03:42:31 UTC
anaconda has the support, they're just not enabled by default as a distribution level decision. i know that, but why not enableing them by default? suse has that and from my understanding suse is now kinda like a direct competitor... anyway, i think that it would be very nice to enable all the fs by default... my2c d This falls down to what the kernel wants to support by default. suse enables all sorts of other things too. We're not blindly following them off the cliff just because 'xxxx option is cool'. It all comes down to what we consider to be supportable. The other filesystems are available, but if you hit bugs in them, you're basically on your own (take the pieces to the upstream maintainers). Some users don't like this, so we don't make everything under the sun available. |