Bug 1244293
Summary: | NetworkManager support for secondary IPv6 addresses | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | David Sommerseth <davids> |
Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | bgalvani, davids, dcbw, jklimes, ovasik, rkhan, thaller, tore, tpelka, vbenes |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | NetworkManager-1.0.4-8.el7 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
Feature: support for configuring multiple addresses received through DHCPv6 on an interface
Reason: DHCPv6 servers can assign a lease containing multiple IPv6 addresses
Result: support for parsing and assigning multiple addresses from a DHCPv6 lease has been added to NetworkManager
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 11:02:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Sommerseth
2015-07-17 16:50:04 UTC
Patch posted on upstream bug. David or Beniamino do we have dhcpv6 networks somewhere in RH? (In reply to Tomas Pelka from comment #3) > David or Beniamino do we have dhcpv6 networks somewhere in RH? Not inside RH, but the Open Power Hub in Brno have such a setup. I have a VM running there and can help out with any type of testing. just a remark regarding not inside - I meant, I don't know of any dhcpv6 enabled networks inside RH, at least none with also provides secondary addresses too. (In reply to David Sommerseth from comment #5) > just a remark regarding not inside - I meant, I don't know of any dhcpv6 > enabled networks inside RH, at least none with also provides secondary > addresses too. Thanks David! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2315.html |