Bug 12448
Summary: | rpm needs to say which rpms output was generated by | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Jonathan Kamens <jik> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-07-10 16:54:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jonathan Kamens
2000-06-18 20:34:35 UTC
There only 2 error messages, both pathological, on the dependency resolution and transaction set install that do not identify what package was involved . There are of course other errors. Can you supply details of what errors you are referring to? Well, for one, see the "execution of script failed" error I got that is described in bug 12449. Besides that, as I noted in my bug report, I am also concerned about all of the output generated by the external scripts called by rpm during an installation, uninstallation or upgrade. These scripts' output needs to be somehow tagged by rpm so that it is clear which package it came from. Ah, yes. Thanks for the suggestion, fixed in both rpm-3.0.5-0.7/rpm-4.0-0.48. Please reopen this bug if there are other places that better error messages are needed. The messages from installs will be fixed before Red Hat 7.0. It's an obvious and loud problem (and with a more informative error message, it';s now even easier to fix :-) |