Bug 1246278

Summary:	Review Request: golang-github-bazil-fuse - FUSE library for Go
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, rosser.bjr
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-05-02 08:27:33 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Chaloupka 2015-07-23 21:36:17 UTC

Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-bazil-fuse/golang-github-bazil-fuse.spec

SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-bazil-fuse/golang-github-bazil-fuse-0-0.1.git18419ee.fc20.src.rpm

Description: FUSE library for Go

Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup

$ rpmlint golang-github-bazil-fuse-0-0.1.git18419ee.fc20.src.rpm golang-github-bazil-fuse-devel-0-0.1.git18419ee.fc20.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Koji: the packages depends on bz#1246277 which is currently on review. Locally it builds fine.

Comment 1 Ben Rosser 2017-04-15 18:25:30 UTC

Are you still interested in this review? I'd be willing to take it if so.

Comment 2 Jan Chaloupka 2017-04-18 11:01:04 UTC

Hi Ben,

given the spec file is outdated, it should be re-generated. What version of the project are you interested in?

Comment 3 Ben Rosser 2017-04-29 15:49:44 UTC

Sorry for the delay. I was interested in the latest version of the project; it's a build dependency for https://github.com/ChrisRx/dungeonfs (which I'm not currently interested in packaging, but might be in the future when it's further along).

Comment 4 Jan Chaloupka 2017-05-02 08:27:33 UTC

In that case let's package the dependency once it is needed.