Bug 124676
| Summary: | rpc.rquotad not configurable to a predefined port | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Need Real Name <mb/redhat> | ||||
| Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Steve Dickson <steved> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 2 | CC: | mattdm, riel | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-06-30 03:28:32 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 133398 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Need Real Name
2004-05-28 13:41:52 UTC
Created attachment 100663 [details]
trivial fix
Maybe one could include the "-S" functionality of rquotad later, too!
The rpc.rquotad from quota-3.10 (latest in fc2) has a bug in it. The -p option uses the port without first converting it to network byte order (htons). Newer quota packages from upstream have fixed this bug. A workaround is to specify the port in big endian (e.g. "rpc.rquotad -p 39426" for port 666). This bug is no longer blocked now that bug 131594 and bug 131862 are fixed. OK, I guess we should evaluate the patch from comment #1 and merge it, if it's still nedede with quota-3.12... I've confirmed the patch works "as is" with the quota-3.12-5 RPM from FC3 test 3. Fixed in nfs-utils-1.0.6-38 An update never went out for FC2, which this was filed against, but FC3 shipped with 1.0.6-39, which is greater than the version mentioned in comment #6. |