Bug 1247097

Summary: <function vm_name at 0x3a989b0> displayed in control simulation vm selection dropdown list
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Aziza Karol <akarol>
Component: ControlAssignee: Greg McCullough <gmccullo>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Dmitry Misharov <dmisharo>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.4.0CC: akarol, hkataria, jfrey, jhardy, mpovolny, mzazrivec, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: 5.6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: control:ui
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-02-23 05:34:53 EST Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Description Flags
snpshot none

Description Aziza Karol 2015-07-27 06:32:11 EDT
Created attachment 1056535 [details]

Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Navigate to control simulation
2.In Event Selection select
  Type:VM operation
  Event: VM power on (or any other event)
3.In VM selection select Single VM and  check the drop down list

Actual results:
<function vm_name at 0x3a989b0> is displayed.Vms with this name does not exists. see attached screenshot

Expected results:
only VMs should be displayed.

Additional info:
Comment 3 Milan Z√°zrivec 2015-08-03 10:20:27 EDT
After some investigation -- UI basically does nothing wrong here,
it's just displaying information about a VM's name as it is stored
in the database.

Not sure how the info got there though, my guess is during discovery.
Comment 4 Milan Z√°zrivec 2015-08-03 10:22:00 EDT
Changing this to the 'Providers' component (not entirely sure it's
the right component here).

Please route it as you see appropriate.

Comment 5 Greg Blomquist 2016-02-19 16:49:53 EST
This one is making the rounds.  GM, this sounds like something in control?
Comment 6 Greg McCullough 2016-02-19 19:38:50 EST
Azaiz - This just got assigned over to me and I am unable to recreate on a 5.5 and upstream.  Are you still able to recreate this situation, and if so can we get access to your appliance or database?  Otherwise I would suggest we close this ticket.  Thanks.
Comment 7 Aziza Karol 2016-02-23 05:34:53 EST
This issue is not reproducible in 
Closing the ticket.