Bug 1247351
| Summary: | [debuginfo package] libcdio ships executable source files | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Stadelmann <fedora> |
| Component: | libcdio | Assignee: | Adrian Reber <adrian> |
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | adrian, fkluknav, hhorak |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-07-28 16:29:42 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Christian Stadelmann
2015-07-27 19:39:35 UTC
Thanks for the bug report, but are you sure that really is a problem. This is how we get the source code from upstream. This sounds like something which should be discussed with upstream. I can change the files in the build process to be not executable but I do not really see the benefit. I would recommend contacting the upstream authors of libcdio so that they can fix it in git. In theory, yes (if the file started with something like a crunchbang, e.g. !#/bin/sh). But yes, I think upstream git fixes would be the best. Resolved in the upstream repository: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libcdio.git;a=commit;h=8a8bca964108b7a8c70fa503932160e98eb5af1e |