Bug 1250573

Summary:	configure check fails on s390(x)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Dan Horák <dan>
Component:	PyQwt	Assignee:	Tadej Janež <tadej.j>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	23	CC:	tadej.j
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	s390x
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-07-27 13:28:54 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	467765

Description Dan Horák 2015-08-05 13:30:51 UTC

The configure check in PyQwt fails with

...
Found SIP-4.16.9.
Found 'posix' operating system:
2.7.10 (default, Jul 27 2015, 08:20:43) 
[GCC 5.1.1 20150618 (Red Hat 5.1.1-4)]
Do not get upset by error messages in the next 3 compiler checks:
Check if 'size_t' and 'unsigned int' are the same type:
NO
Check if 'size_t' and 'unsigned long' are the same type:
YES
Check if 'size_t' and 'unsigned long long' are the same type:
NO
Found NumPy-1.9.2.
Failed to import qwt_version_info.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GxCi9a (%build)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GxCi9a (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.


For full logs please see http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1928855

I did some investigation earlier and it should be related to some other changes how are the INCLUDES/CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS passed to the consumers, IIRC in the qmake specs (linux-g++ vs linux-g++-64). So might be actually a qmake/qt5 bug.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
PyQwt-5.2.0-29.fc23

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2016-07-27 13:28:54 UTC

seems fixed in F-24 and up, closing