Bug 1250674
Summary: | please build golang-googlecode-gcfg for epel7 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Carl George <carl> |
Component: | golang-googlecode-gcfg | Assignee: | FridolĂn PokornĂ˝ <fpokorny> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel7 | CC: | adam, fpokorny, golang-updates, jchaloup, lsm5, vbatts |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-14 13:39:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1250094 |
Description
Carl George
2015-08-05 18:28:49 UTC
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL#The_procedure_for_getting_a_package_in_EPEL "If there is no answer within seven days the proposed EPEL maintainer is free to request the EPEL branch and become the EPEL Maintainer (CC the Fedora maintainer here as well)." I don't think it is a good idea to debundle golang dependencies for epel7 as there is a high chance of migrating epel7 projects into rhel7 causing repeated removal of dependencies from epel7. The same happened for etcd. I am not against debundling in epel7. However, after experience with fedora and el6, it just another overhead without much benefits. Asciinema can be built from bundled deps (following the recent guideline change). Just Provides: bundled(...) needs to be added to its spec file. This is no longer needed, asciinema switched back to Python. |