Bug 1250854
Summary: | [WHQL][vioscsi]The job named crash dump failed on windows 2008 -32/64 platform | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Min Deng <mdeng> | ||||||
Component: | virtio-win | Assignee: | Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe> | ||||||
virtio-win sub component: | virtio-win-prewhql | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Severity: | high | ||||||||
Priority: | unspecified | CC: | lijin, lmiksik, vrozenfe, wyu | ||||||
Version: | 7.3 | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
Doc Text: |
NO_DOCS
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 08:48:50 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1288337 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Min Deng
2015-08-06 07:25:29 UTC
Created attachment 1059745 [details]
Logs
Created attachment 1060323 [details]
win2008-64-108-scsi wlk log
Hi Vadim I have upload the log again,please have a look. (In reply to lijin from comment #4) > Hi Vadim > I have upload the log again,please have a look. thanks a lot. Does it happens in single-queue mode only or in mq as well? (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #5) > (In reply to lijin from comment #4) > > Hi Vadim > > I have upload the log again,please have a look. > > thanks a lot. > Does it happens in single-queue mode only or in mq as well? Vadim, It happens on singel-queue and QE could not verify this job as it was blocked by 1249867.Any issues please let me know,thanks ! Best Regards, Min (In reply to dengmin from comment #6) > (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #5) > > (In reply to lijin from comment #4) > > > Hi Vadim > > > I have upload the log again,please have a look. > > > > thanks a lot. > > Does it happens in single-queue mode only or in mq as well? > > Vadim, > It happens on singel-queue and QE could not verify this job as it was > blocked by 1249867.Any issues please let me know,thanks ! > > Best Regards, > Min Thanks Min, Could you please try build 109, available at http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/virtio-win-prewhql/0.1/109/win/virtio-win-prewhql-0.1.zip ? Best regards, Vadim. (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #7) > (In reply to dengmin from comment #6) > > (In reply to Vadim Rozenfeld from comment #5) > > > (In reply to lijin from comment #4) > > > > Hi Vadim > > > > I have upload the log again,please have a look. > > > > > > thanks a lot. > > > Does it happens in single-queue mode only or in mq as well? > > > > Vadim, > > It happens on singel-queue and QE could not verify this job as it was > > blocked by 1249867.Any issues please let me know,thanks ! > > > > Best Regards, > > Min > > Thanks Min, > Could you please try build 109, available at > http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/virtio-win-prewhql/0.1/ > 109/win/virtio-win-prewhql-0.1.zip ? > > Best regards, > Vadim. Hi Vadim, Re-tested the bug via above build and find the job could pass finally.So the issue has been fixed on build 109,thanks in advance. Best Regards Min change status to verified according to comment#8 This bug is tightly coupled with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210166 Moving it to 7.3 as well. Re-test this bug with virtio-win-prewhql-120(with virtio1.0 device), the job could pass .So the issue has been fixed on build 120. Thanks Yu Wang According to comment#13, change status to verified. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2609.html |