Bug 1251238
| Summary: | Review Request: yubioath-desktop - Yubikey tool for generating OATH tokens | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Seth Jennings <sethdjennings> | ||||
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Adam Miller <admiller> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | admiller, package-review | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | admiller:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | 2.2.1-1.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-09-11 17:22:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Seth Jennings
2015-08-06 18:36:55 UTC
Created attachment 1060060 [details] self-reporting fedora-review This is my first package submission so, afaict, I need a sponsor. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10625020 The %{__python} should be %{__python2} as per python packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python
Otherwise things look good.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v3 or later)". Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/admiller/reviews/1251238-yubioath-
desktop/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps,
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
contains icons.
Note: icons in yubioath-desktop
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
yubioath-desktop.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Yubikey -> Crikey
yubioath-desktop.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Yubikey -> Crikey
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
yubioath-desktop.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Yubikey -> Crikey
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Requires
--------
yubioath-desktop (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/python
desktop-file-utils
pcsc-lite-ccid
pyscard
python(abi)
python-crypto
python-pyside
ykpers
Provides
--------
yubioath-desktop:
application()
application(yubioath.desktop)
yubioath-desktop
Source checksums
----------------
https://developers.yubico.com/yubioath-desktop/Releases/yubioath-desktop-2.1.1.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 8d4243311d7cbd08970d81e38616f90b851fa73939bf7ffaa91fe5c2aa2025d5
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8d4243311d7cbd08970d81e38616f90b851fa73939bf7ffaa91fe5c2aa2025d5
https://developers.yubico.com/yubioath-desktop/Releases/yubioath-desktop-2.1.1.tar.gz.sig :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ba0069877c5d772fab224c0ee6a9a07260b3c70501342ce8eb6b661b50cd77cb
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ba0069877c5d772fab224c0ee6a9a07260b3c70501342ce8eb6b661b50cd77cb
Template Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1251238
Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Adam, thanks for the review! New spec and SRPM using the __python2 macro. Spec URL: https://www.variantweb.net/pub/fedora/specs/yubioath-desktop.spec SRPM URL: https://www.variantweb.net/pub/fedora/22/source/SRPMS/yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-3.fc22.src.rpm Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v3 or later)". Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/admiller/reviews/1251238-yubioath-
desktop/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps,
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
contains icons.
Note: icons in yubioath-desktop
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-2.fc22.noarch.rpm
yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
yubioath-desktop.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Yubikey -> Crikey
yubioath-desktop.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Yubikey -> Crikey
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
yubioath-desktop.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Yubikey -> Crikey
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Requires
--------
yubioath-desktop (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/python
desktop-file-utils
pcsc-lite-ccid
pyscard
python(abi)
python-crypto
python-pyside
ykpers
Provides
--------
yubioath-desktop:
application()
application(yubioath.desktop)
yubioath-desktop
Source checksums
----------------
https://developers.yubico.com/yubioath-desktop/Releases/yubioath-desktop-2.1.1.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 8d4243311d7cbd08970d81e38616f90b851fa73939bf7ffaa91fe5c2aa2025d5
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8d4243311d7cbd08970d81e38616f90b851fa73939bf7ffaa91fe5c2aa2025d5
https://developers.yubico.com/yubioath-desktop/Releases/yubioath-desktop-2.1.1.tar.gz.sig :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ba0069877c5d772fab224c0ee6a9a07260b3c70501342ce8eb6b661b50cd77cb
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ba0069877c5d772fab224c0ee6a9a07260b3c70501342ce8eb6b661b50cd77cb
Template Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1251238
Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
PASSED
Apply for packager in FAS, I will sponsor you. Adam, I think you might have to add me. packager Rules for Application are: Please do not apply to this group. Your sponsor will add you after you've completed http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers. There is no apply option for that group. You are correct, my mistake. I just became a sponsor last week :) Sorry about that, you are now a packager and are sponsored. Feel free to file a SCM request for DistGit. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: yubioath-desktop Short Description: Yubikey tool for generating OATH event-based HOTP and time-based TOTP codes Upstream URL: https://developers.yubico.com/yubioath-desktop/ Owners: spartacus06 Branches: f22 f23 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238 yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238 yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yubioath-desktop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13846 yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yubioath-desktop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13847 yubioath-desktop-2.2.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yubioath-desktop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14790 yubioath-desktop-2.2.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update yubioath-desktop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14791 yubioath-desktop-2.2.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. yubioath-desktop-2.2.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |