Bug 1253533
Summary: | virt-who still can be executed at background with -b option, but no -b or VIRTWHO_BACKGROUND any more | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Eko <hsun> |
Component: | virt-who | Assignee: | Radek Novacek <rnovacek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | xingge <gxing> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | dazhang, gxing, ldai, ovasik, sgao, shihliu |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | virt-who-0.14-4.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-19 11:57:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Eko
2015-08-14 03:03:56 UTC
Fixed in virt-who-0.14-4.el7. Verified it on virt-who-0.14-4.el7 since all -b related function has been removed Verified version virt-who-0.14-4.el7.noarch subscription-manager-1.15.9-6.el7.x86_64 python-rhsm-1.15.4-2.el7.x86_64 SAM-1.4.1-RHEL-6-20141113.0 Verified process: 1. Register system to SAM 2. Stop virt-who service. 3. Run virt-who with -b, it will show error info [root@ibm-hs22-01 ~]# systemctl stop virt-who [root@ibm-hs22-01 ~]# virt-who -b -d Usage: virt-who [-d] [-i INTERVAL] [-o] [--sam|--satellite5|--satellite6] [--libvirt|--vdsm|--esx|--rhevm|--hyperv] virtwho.py: error: no such option: -b [root@ibm-hs22-01 ~]# ps -ef|grep virt-who root 9305 8546 0 09:48 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto virt-who Result: -b option has been removed, it can't run virt-who with -b option Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2370.html |