Bug 1253788

Summary: RFE: Merge rxvt-unicode subpackages
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood>
Component: rxvt-unicodeAssignee: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: andreas.bierfert, jamielinux, opensource
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-19 17:30:47 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jonathan Underwood 2015-08-14 17:22:41 UTC
Description of problem:
Running this perl script:

http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1349

in a urxvt term shows that colours beyond 87 are missing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rxvt-unicode-9.21-3.fc22.x86_64

How reproducible:
Everytime

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download the script above and run perl colortest
2. Compare the output with what you see in xterm or gnome-terminal

Comment 1 Jonathan Underwood 2015-08-14 17:34:43 UTC
OK, so, I see that 256 color support is provided in a separate packagerxvt-unicode-256color , and a separate binary, urxvt256c.  This is really confusing for users, and is inconsistent with 99% of the web documentation. Why don't we switch to building 256 color support by default?

Comment 2 Jonathan Underwood 2015-08-18 17:44:06 UTC
Similarly, I don't see any reason not to ship the default binary with multi language support. Shipping the four separate binaries really doesn't seem to serve much purpose? Or am I missing something?

Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 17:30:47 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.