Bug 1253931

Summary: Please include a static package
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mark Harfouche <mark.harfouche>
Component: libssh2Assignee: Paul Howarth <paul>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: djuran, kdudka, paul
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-03-24 09:24:55 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch for creating a static package none

Description Mark Harfouche 2015-08-15 19:13:27 UTC
Created attachment 1063303 [details]
patch for creating a static package

Static libraries are useful in certain cases.

I've attached a patch for creating a static package.

In the meantime, if anybody wants, here is a copr repo with libssh2-static

https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/hmaarrfk/fedora-static/

Comment 1 Paul Howarth 2015-08-16 09:08:29 UTC
The packaging guidelines discourage the use of static libraries except under exceptional circumstances:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries

I don't think being "useful in certain cases" qualifies as "exceptional" really. Do you have a more specific use-case that could justify it?

Comment 2 Mark Harfouche 2015-08-17 17:18:02 UTC
I'm currently working on a project where a statically linked version of qemu would be very helpful.

The reason for this is that I require to chroot and run a qemu executable.
If qemu is not statically linked, I will need to copy in a large (unknown) amount of libraries into the new chroot.

Thanks for your help.


Side note:
I understand the desire to not have static libraries in the -devel packages, but having a seprate -static package is not a big deal. Developers can decide if statically linking is useful for their applications.

As a Fedora user, I find the lack of availability of -static libraries to be a barrier when moving from a Debian based distro.

Is there somewhere I can more formally make this point?

Comment 3 Mark Harfouche 2015-08-17 17:22:57 UTC
An other note, I'm not sure of the necessity of this specific statically linked library for what I need from qemu-arm-static.

You can target this bug against F22. In the case that I don't get back to you with the necessity of this -static package, this bug will be squashed.

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 13:37:12 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Comment 5 Kamil Dudka 2016-03-24 09:24:55 UTC
I am closing this bug until we have a good enough reason to reopen it.