Bug 1255448

Summary:	The 32bit versions of krb5-server and krb5-server-ldap should not be distributed
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Patrik Kis <pkis>
Component:	krb5	Assignee:	Robbie Harwood <rharwood>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	22	CC:	dennis, dpal, jdisnard, kerberos-dev-list, kevin, nalin, nathaniel, pkis, sgallagh, zbyszek
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
URL:	https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6346
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-03-10 19:11:42 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1255450

Description Patrik Kis 2015-08-20 15:25:16 UTC

Description of problem:

The 32bit version of krb5-server and krb5-server-ldap (i.e. krb5-server.i686, krb5-server.s390, krb5-server.ppc) are distributed in Fedora. But krb5-server contains no libs and krb5-server-ldap has only internal API. Therefore it should not be distributed at all. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
krb5-1.13.1-3.fc22

How reproducible:
always

Additional info:
If these packages will be blacklisted, it would be nice to add the as obsolete in the krb5 spec file too.

Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2015-09-01 21:36:06 UTC

This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 3 Robbie Harwood 2016-01-28 20:33:38 UTC

Sorry, why is this needed?  These packages are perfectly functional in Fedora, and have the same contents across all architectures as far as I know.  Is there some bit of Fedora policy I'm missing?

Comment 4 Nalin Dahyabhai 2016-01-28 20:52:45 UTC

I expect this is about keeping the 32-bit versions of those packages out of the 64-bit trees.  Unlike other plugins in krb5-libs and krb5-pkinit, the plugins in krb5-server and krb5-server-ldap are only used by the KDC, so there's no point in including versions of them that don't match architecture of the KDC binary.

Comment 5 Patrik Kis 2016-01-29 08:25:20 UTC

Yes they are functional, but these 2 sub-packages are needless, as Nalin pointed out (thanks), so I believe the full functionality will be kept without them.

Comment 6 Robbie Harwood 2016-01-29 17:17:19 UTC

Thanks.  I've opened a rel-eng ticket.

Comment 7 Robbie Harwood 2016-03-10 19:11:42 UTC

This should be fixed for fc24.