Bug 1256104

Summary:	Review Request: holtz - Abstract strategy board game collection
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ben Boeckel <fedora>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	audrey, fedora, james.hogarth, package-review, rosser.bjr
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-02-06 01:45:09 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449, 1364745

Description Ben Boeckel 2015-08-24 00:02:06 UTC

Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/holtz/holtz.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/holtz/holtz-1.4.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
Holtz is an implementation of the two player abstract board games Zertz and
Dvonn from the gipf probject (www.gipf.com). It also has two other games called
Relax and Bloks.

* Zertz is about placing and collecting stones, making sacrifices, and a
  continuously shriking board.
* Dvonn is about controlling stacks of stones which can jump on other stacks to
  capture them and keeping contact to the three dvonn stones.
* Relax resembles the game "Take it Easy".
* Bloks is about placing oddly shaped pieces on an increasingly crowded board.

Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10800610

Comment 1 Jeremy Newton 2016-11-17 23:12:02 UTC

The links gives 404 errors, are you still interested in this review?

Comment 2 Ben Boeckel 2016-12-05 18:41:07 UTC

Yep, still interested; just need to get old reviews moved over to fp.o (been doing it on-demand). I'll hopefully get to moving this over later this week.

Comment 3 Jeremy Newton 2016-12-05 22:35:20 UTC

(In reply to Ben Boeckel from comment #2)
> Yep, still interested; just need to get old reviews moved over to fp.o (been
> doing it on-demand). I'll hopefully get to moving this over later this week.

If you would like, I can review swap with you. I'm working on getting another review request ready that I should have ready this week.

Comment 4 Audrey Yeena Toskin 2017-03-06 22:29:16 UTC

What's the status here? More games in Fedora is always a good thing :)

Comment 5 Ben Rosser 2017-08-23 00:43:03 UTC

Hi,

As per the "stalled package reviews" policy [1]: are you still interested in this package? It's been several months since the last comment inquiring after the status; please respond soon if you're still interested in submitting this.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding

Comment 6 Ben Rosser 2018-02-06 01:45:09 UTC

More than a week has passed, so... I'll close this ticket as a dead review.