Bug 1256104

Summary: Review Request: holtz - Abstract strategy board game collection
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ben Boeckel <mathstuf>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: andrew, james.hogarth, mathstuf, package-review, rosser.bjr
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-02-06 01:45:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 1364745    

Description Ben Boeckel 2015-08-24 00:02:06 UTC
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/holtz/holtz.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/holtz/holtz-1.4.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
Holtz is an implementation of the two player abstract board games Zertz and
Dvonn from the gipf probject (www.gipf.com). It also has two other games called
Relax and Bloks.

* Zertz is about placing and collecting stones, making sacrifices, and a
  continuously shriking board.
* Dvonn is about controlling stacks of stones which can jump on other stacks to
  capture them and keeping contact to the three dvonn stones.
* Relax resembles the game "Take it Easy".
* Bloks is about placing oddly shaped pieces on an increasingly crowded board.

Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10800610

Comment 1 Jeremy Newton 2016-11-17 23:12:02 UTC
The links gives 404 errors, are you still interested in this review?

Comment 2 Ben Boeckel 2016-12-05 18:41:07 UTC
Yep, still interested; just need to get old reviews moved over to fp.o (been doing it on-demand). I'll hopefully get to moving this over later this week.

Comment 3 Jeremy Newton 2016-12-05 22:35:20 UTC
(In reply to Ben Boeckel from comment #2)
> Yep, still interested; just need to get old reviews moved over to fp.o (been
> doing it on-demand). I'll hopefully get to moving this over later this week.

If you would like, I can review swap with you. I'm working on getting another review request ready that I should have ready this week.

Comment 4 Andrew Toskin 2017-03-06 22:29:16 UTC
What's the status here? More games in Fedora is always a good thing :)

Comment 5 Ben Rosser 2017-08-23 00:43:03 UTC
Hi,

As per the "stalled package reviews" policy [1]: are you still interested in this package? It's been several months since the last comment inquiring after the status; please respond soon if you're still interested in submitting this.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding

Comment 6 Ben Rosser 2018-02-06 01:45:09 UTC
More than a week has passed, so... I'll close this ticket as a dead review.