Bug 1256232
| Summary: | dnf check-update shows obsoletes which it should not show (relaxngDatatype and msv packages with jpackage-generic repopo) IMHO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Hutař <jhutar> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | jsilhan, mluscon, packaging-team-maint, pnemade, rholy, tim.lauridsen, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2015-08-31 14:05:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
IIUC the relation is following: msv (installed) < relaxngDatatype-1.0-3.jpp5 < relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22 (installed) DNF couldn't know what state is better (more updated) for the user. It could be "relaxngDatatype-1.0-3.jpp5" or "msv AND relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22". (in any case at least one package is obsoleted / in lower version than package available) Thanks DNF that you give hints and let the user decide! |
Description of problem: `dnf check-update` reports some obsoletes but on packages which IMHO should not be updated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-1.1.0-2.fc22.noarch libsolv-0.6.11-2.fc22.x86_64 relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22.noarch msv-1.2-0.20050722.6.jpp5.noarch How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. With packages installed 2. # dnf check-update Obsoleting Packages relaxngDatatype.noarch 1.0-3.jpp5 jpackage-generic msv.noarch 1.2-0.20050722.6.jpp5 @System 3. # dnf upgrade Nothing to do. Actual results: `dnf check-update` complains abbout relaxngDatatype-1.0-3.jpp5 obsolete, but I have relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22.noarch installed (which should be of a newer version). Expected results: IMHO `dnf check-update` should only report issues with unrelated packages. Additional info: I do not know if this is dnf issue, libsolv issue or simply packaging issue on JPackage of Fedora side. Also maybe this is just me reading `dnf check-update` output incorrectly. This is what these packages obsoletes: # rpm -q relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22 --obsoletes # rpm -qp relaxngDatatype-1.0-3.jpp5.noarch.rpm --obsoletes msv Just in case this is important - one of the package doesn't seem to have epoch set but looks like dnf understands it correctly: # rpm -qi relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22 | grep Epoch # rpm -qpi relaxngDatatype-1.0-3.jpp5.noarch.rpm | grep Epoch Epoch : 0 # dnf info relaxngDatatype-2011.1-1.fc22 | grep -e 'Epoch' -e 'Repo' -e 'From repo' This system is not registered with Spacewalk server. Spacewalk based repositories will be disabled. Epoch : 0 Repo : @System From repo : fedora # dnf info relaxngDatatype-1.0-3.jpp5 | grep -e 'Epoch' -e 'Repo' -e 'From repo' This system is not registered with Spacewalk server. Spacewalk based repositories will be disabled. Epoch : 0 Repo : jpackage-generic And mine JPackage repo file is: # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/jpackage-generic.repo [jpackage-generic] name=JPackage generic mirrorlist=http://www.jpackage.org/mirrorlist.php?dist=generic&type=free&release=5.0 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///mnt/tests/CoreOS/Spacewalk/Installer/setup-repos/jpackage-generic/jpackage.asc