Bug 1257760
| Summary: | [RFE] OSE3 to assign a new namespace for everyuser like ose2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Ryan Howe <rhowe> |
| Component: | RFE | Assignee: | Paul Weil <pweil> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 3.0.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, bbennett, erich, jkaur, jokerman, mmccomas, rhowe, rmartine, tpoitras |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Question |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-09-15 19:12:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ryan Howe
2015-08-27 22:16:55 UTC
This seems like it is already possible, this may need to be changed to an docs bug to better outline in more detail how one would accomplish this with v3 to mimic what v2 does. https://docs.openshift.com/enterprise/3.0/architecture/core_concepts/routes.html#custom-default-routing-subdomain Hey Ryan, Aside from ensuring that there are no conflicts between any of the users, what other reasons would a user have for customizing the default routing subdomain? Just trying to add some context. Regarding your comment#2, what other technical details need to be added here? Timothy, This bug what created to restrict users restricted to a specific default sub-domain. I would consider this RFE satisfied as we have outlined how set a default routing suffix. Best Ryan, I agree we show HOW to do this, but we don't really explain WHY you'd want to. Can you please help me by answering the following: Aside from ensuring that there are no conflicts between any of the users, what other reasons would a user have for customizing the default routing subdomain? Thank you. :) This is related to bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243795 Bug is to use the following wordpress.myproject.apps.example.com instead of: wordpress-myproject.apps.example.com They want the namespace locked in to the default routing subdomain for each namespace. Example of how this might look in the master-config.yaml file. routingConfig: subdomain: {{ NAMESPACE }}.apps.example.com Where namespace is used as part of the domain. *** Bug 1243795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1059813 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |