Bug 1259160

Summary: [RFE] SNMP support for RHCS cluster components
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vimal Kumar <vikumar>
Component: CephadmAssignee: Paul Cuzner <pcuzner>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Rahul Lepakshi <rlepaksh>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Ranjini M N <rmandyam>
Priority: high    
Version: 5.0CC: agunn, akarlsso, asriram, assingh, ceph-eng-bugs, ealcaniz, epuertat, flucifre, gmeno, gsitlani, hnallurv, kdreyer, lithomas, mhackett, mmuench, molasaga, mschindl, nojha, oelswah, pasik, pcuzner, rlepaksh, rmandyam, sangadi, scohen, swachira, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: 5.1Flags: sangadi: needinfo+
sangadi: needinfo+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.7-30.el8cp Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.SNMP gateway is now available to receive Prometheus Alertmanager alerts With this release, you can deploy and configure the simple network management protocol (SNMP) gateway in a Red Hat Ceph Storage cluster to receive alerts from the Prometheus Alertmanager and route them as SNMP traps to the cluster. The SNMP gateway daemon transforms the alert into an SNMP Notification and sends it on to a designated SNMP management platform. For more information, see the link:{operations-guide}#configuration-of-snmp-traps[_Configuration of SNMP traps_] chapter in the _{storage-product} Operations Guide_ for details.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-04-04 10:19:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1258382, 2031073    

Description Vimal Kumar 2015-09-02 06:36:02 UTC
1) Description of problem:

This is a feature request to enable SNMP support for Ceph clusters. Either this has to be done for each components separately, ie.. for MONs, OSDs etc.., else this can be enabled for the Calamari host so that all the information the Calamari server has is available to the SNMP monitoring system.

2) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHCS1.3

3) Additional info:

This will need one or more MIBs to be created, for the Ceph components so that SNMP can use them to monitor the services/nodes.

Comment 6 Edu Alcaniz 2016-09-16 06:46:13 UTC
Hi, could you update the status of the BZ please

Comment 7 Edu Alcaniz 2017-01-25 12:18:44 UTC
Hi, could you update the status of the BZ please

Comment 8 Edu Alcaniz 2017-05-08 08:24:28 UTC
Morning, Is it possible to get an update about this BZ please.

Comment 10 Ian Colle 2017-06-06 04:49:17 UTC
Is this a priority for 3.0?

Comment 11 Neil Levine 2017-06-06 05:13:45 UTC
Assuming the LoE is high, no.

PaulC had a suggestion on how to implement this on the collectd modules he is using in his dashboard however I think John needs to chat with him and agree our approach.

Comment 12 Harish NV Rao 2017-07-26 06:57:57 UTC
(In reply to Neil Levine from comment #11)
> Assuming the LoE is high, no.
> 
> PaulC had a suggestion on how to implement this on the collectd modules he
> is using in his dashboard however I think John needs to chat with him and
> agree our approach.

@Neil, Is this going to be supported in 3.0? If not, could you please move it out of 3.0?

Comment 13 Federico Lucifredi 2017-07-27 15:22:21 UTC
"patches accepted" if anyone in the Community is interested. 

No resources to develop or test this in 3.0. Moving to 3.1.

Comment 23 Federico Lucifredi 2018-10-22 20:38:43 UTC
bugzilla engine grumble mumble... ;-)

Comment 27 Neha Ojha 2019-03-07 22:50:30 UTC
Looks like work related this will be done through the ceph-dashboard: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679609

Federico, thoughts?

Comment 31 Giridhar Ramaraju 2019-08-05 13:06:21 UTC
Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate. 

Regards,
Giri

Comment 32 Giridhar Ramaraju 2019-08-05 13:09:01 UTC
Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate. 

Regards,
Giri

Comment 42 Federico Lucifredi 2021-10-05 02:45:28 UTC
*** Bug 1897250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 46 Sebastian Wagner 2022-01-18 12:47:29 UTC
backport pr: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/44529

Comment 47 Sebastian Wagner 2022-01-18 13:57:21 UTC
*** Bug 1679609 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 48 Sebastian Wagner 2022-01-18 14:15:18 UTC
this is now in  downstream 5.1 patches

Comment 62 errata-xmlrpc 2022-04-04 10:19:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Security, Enhancement, and Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1174