Bug 1259296
| Summary: | [abrt] kernel paging request at dentry_free | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Meike <meike.iwanek> | ||||
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 22 | CC: | gansalmon, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, madhu.chinakonda, mchehab | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| URL: | https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/e74895420a0b3aa2d8ed1bae2bffc9670caf2782 | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:d1176ca13d3dd7e7c733d926666a162a6eab5090 | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-09-04 07:38:58 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Meike
2015-09-02 11:40:16 UTC
Created attachment 1069380 [details]
File: dmesg
The failing instruction is: f0 ff 48 f0 lock decl -0x10(%rax) Looking at some registers, it may be that you had a single bit flip. I'd try running memtest. RAX: ffff88080e9ca338 RDX: ffff88000e9ca338 RDI: ffff88000e9ca300 I had tested the memory extensively with Memtest86+ from the Fedora Live media (over night, multiple passes) a few months ago, when I bought it from Crucial, without finding any problems. I tested it again now, and you were right: it immediately found 3 faulty bits in the first 256MB, always the same bits, a few thousand occurences. I didn't think it can go bad after inserting and testing it. Thanks for looking into this! |