Bug 1260241
| Summary: | RFE: install gdmflexiserver in /usr/libexec, and provide a wrapper script so that XFCE can switch users using either gdm or lightdm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sam Varshavchik <mrsam> |
| Component: | xfce4-xfswitch-plugin | Assignee: | Orphan Owner <extras-orphan> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | kevin, nonamedotc, normand, rdieter, rstrode, samuel-rhbugs |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-03-21 10:11:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sam Varshavchik
2015-09-04 22:23:02 UTC
So this doesn't make much sense to me. why should running something that starts with "gdm" in its name make lightdm start up? I understand the problem you're having, and how your solution would fix the problem, but I don't think it makes sense architecturally. Probably what would make more sense would be for xfce to either support lightdm directly, or hide the switch user option if gdm isn't running. Hiding the option unless gdm is installed would be a step backwards. XFCE is perfectly capable of using lightdm for this option, so taking it away completely isn't the right solution. The responsible (and optional) package is xfce4-xfswitch-plugin that is currently orphaned in rawhide. Maybe you want to ask at upstream if there is some patch possible to support also lightdm via dm-tool, this is not a point to discuss in a distribution as Fedora is, please do not complicate things that much. I agree with Ray Strode that gdmflexiserver is not the right thing to use as a wrapper. With my lightdm maintainer hat on, I wouldn't object to xfce providing *some* type of wrapper, but only if it doesn't replace or interfere with any existing gdmflexiserver (provided by gdm). I also agree with other sentiments here, that xfce offering full/proper support (via using lightdm's dm-tool or whatever) would be even better. I'm closing this bug. I'm no longer active in Fedora and won't be able to work on it. If somebody wants to invest effort, it should happen upstream. However upstream no longer maintains this plugin, so there is nothing we can do. |