Bug 1260313 (ganv)

Summary: Review Request: ganv - An interactive GTK Widget for "boxes and lines"
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Brian Monroe <briancmonroe>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: briancmonroe, fri8k, mark, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:52:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1111433    
Bug Blocks: 201449    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch that fixes many spec-file issues none

Description Brian Monroe 2015-09-05 22:38:10 UTC
==Links==
Spec File: https://paradoxguitarist.fedorapeople.org/ganv.spec
SRPM: https://paradoxguitarist.fedorapeople.org/synthclone-0.3.0-3.fc22.src.rpm
Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10967268

==Description==
Ganv is an interactive Gtk canvas widget for graph-based interfaces (patch bays,
modular synthesizers, finite state automation, interactive graphs, etc). Ganv
provides classes for "Modules" (boxes with "Ports"), Circles, and Edges (lines
that connect either Ports or Circles).  The user can rearrange items, or Ganv
can automatically arrange items using GraphViz.  Edges can be made by the user
one at a time with the mouse, or in groups using the mouse and keyboard.

==Extra Info==
My first package hasn't been approved yet, but I'll add it as a blocker. The purpose for packaging this is to ultimately package patchage, a requested package for the Fedora Jam spin. Patchage requires ganv to build/run, so I'm packaging this one first.

Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2015-09-06 21:59:01 UTC
The SRPM link is wrong, and it also looks like you have the bug dependencies backwards, if you intended to make this bug depend on your previous one for which you hope to get sponsored.

Comment 2 Brian Monroe 2015-09-06 22:42:24 UTC
Dang it! I thought I had looked over all of this. 

The spec file is https://paradoxguitarist.fedorapeople.org/ganv-1.4.2-1.fc22.src.rpm

Comment 3 Brian Monroe 2015-09-06 22:42:54 UTC
I meant SRPM, that's what was missing.

Comment 4 Jens Lody 2015-09-07 08:25:22 UTC
Created attachment 1070858 [details]
Patch that fixes many spec-file issues

You should run fedora-review on your package(s) before asking for review:

<snip>
Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: ganv-lib : /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/box.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/canvas.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/circle.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/edge.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/ganv.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/group.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/item.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/module.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/node.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/port.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/text.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/types.h ganv-lib :
  /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/widget.h
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
  are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
  Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
</snip>

<snip>
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ganv-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
          ganv-lib-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
          ganv-1.4.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
ganv.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency ganv-lib
ganv.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin
ganv.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ganv_bench
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/module.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/ganv.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/node.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/port.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/types.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/text.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/wrap.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/widget.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/group.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Box.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/item.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/types.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Port.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Canvas.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Node.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/box.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Edge.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/ganv.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/lib64
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/edge.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Circle.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/include
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/circle.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Item.hpp
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/ganv-1.pc
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/canvas.h
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/ganv-1/ganv/Module.hpp
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 30 warnings.
</snip>

I attach a patch that fixes most of these issues (at least the packaging issues).
There are still rpmlint error/warnings:
<snip>
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ganv-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
          ganv-lib-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
          ganv-devel-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
          ganv-1.4.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
ganv.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ganv_bench
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ganv-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
ganv-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: ganv-debuginfo-1.4.2-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
ganv-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
ganv-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libgtkmm-2.4.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libatkmm-1.6.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libgdkmm-2.4.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libgiomm-2.4.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libpangomm-1.4.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libglibmm-2.4.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libcairomm-1.0.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libfreetype.so.6
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libcdt.so.5
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libganv-1.so.1.4.2 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
ganv-lib.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ganv.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://drobilla.net/software/ganv ''
ganv.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ganv_bench
ganv-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
ganv-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 20 warnings.
</snip>

I have no time to look into these deeper at the moment (at work currently).

Comment 5 Brian Monroe 2015-09-07 18:05:42 UTC
Thanks Jens, 

I saw those sections on headers and libs files, but didn't fully understand it. I'll go through the fedora-review and fix all the issues.

Comment 6 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-12-03 16:03:55 UTC
pbrobinson's scratch build of gtk-sharp-beans?#bbba0aef7a4bd673006df5b9a85a5763d9c026bc for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gtk-sharp-beans?#bbba0aef7a4bd673006df5b9a85a5763d9c026bc failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12037959

Comment 7 Upstream Release Monitoring 2015-12-03 16:06:12 UTC
pbrobinson's scratch build of gtk-murrine-engine?#b4bddbf235c281d671c99e8008f609b6d4e314d0 for epel7-archbootstrap and git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gtk-murrine-engine?#b4bddbf235c281d671c99e8008f609b6d4e314d0 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12037955

Comment 8 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:52:37 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 9 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:52:21 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.