Bug 1262685

Summary:	sssd-tools should be moved from Optional to base
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Jan Blazek <jblazek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.3	CC:	jblazek, jhrozek, jstodola, mbanas, tlavigne
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-11-19 07:54:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jakub Hrozek 2015-09-14 06:07:24 UTC

Description of problem:
The sssd-tools package is in the Optional channel. However, we're adding features to the package, which means customers will be looking for it.

We need to move the sssd-tools package from optional to base.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
as of 7.2 beta

Comment 2 Jakub Hrozek 2015-09-17 11:10:37 UTC

Ping, any chance of doing this in 7.2 ?

Comment 3 Jan Blazek 2015-09-17 11:22:18 UTC

(In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #2)
> Ping, any chance of doing this in 7.2 ?

If this bug gets all the required flags including exception or blocker then yes.

Comment 7 Jan Blazek 2015-09-23 08:52:16 UTC

There are separate optional repos per each variant/architecture.

What non-optional variants/architectures are desired?

What for is actually sssd-tools needed? Is that kind of weak dependency of another package? (from the functional point of view, rpm actually doesn't support weak dependencies)

Client-optional/x86_64
ComputeNode-optional/x86_64
Server-optional/aarch64
Server-optional/ppc64
Server-optional/ppc64le
Server-optional/s390x
Server-optional/x86_64
Workstation-optional/x86_64

Comment 8 Jakub Hrozek 2015-09-23 10:36:27 UTC

(In reply to Jan Blazek from comment #7)
> There are separate optional repos per each variant/architecture.
> 
> What non-optional variants/architectures are desired?
> 

I would say all, because all can very reasonably be a domain member.

> What for is actually sssd-tools needed? Is that kind of weak dependency of
> another package? (from the functional point of view, rpm actually doesn't
> support weak dependencies)
> 

See comment #5. As per dependencies, it's not a dependency, it's an feature itself. (Obviously requires sssd up and running)

> Client-optional/x86_64
> ComputeNode-optional/x86_64
> Server-optional/aarch64
> Server-optional/ppc64
> Server-optional/ppc64le
> Server-optional/s390x
> Server-optional/x86_64
> Workstation-optional/x86_64

Comment 9 Jan Blazek 2015-09-23 11:06:02 UTC

Added to 'Directory Client' comps group which is on all variants/architectures.

diff --git a/comps-rhel-7.2.xml b/comps-rhel-7.2.xml
index 313ddff..75d3711 100644
--- a/comps-rhel-7.2.xml
+++ b/comps-rhel-7.2.xml
@@ -1734,6 +1734,7 @@
       <packagereq type="optional">samba-winbind</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="optional">samba-winbind-clients</packagereq>
       <packagereq type="optional">sssd-dbus</packagereq>
+      <packagereq type="optional">sssd-tools</packagereq>
     </packagelist>
   </group>
   <group>

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 07:54:53 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-2107.html