Bug 1262940

Summary:	Package installs report successful when they have failed on the client
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Stephen Benjamin <stbenjam>
Component:	katello-agent	Assignee:	Stephen Benjamin <stbenjam>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1.2	CC:	abalakht, bbuckingham, cduryee, cwelton, greartes, hkim, jortel, pmoravec, riehecky, rkondusk, tkubota
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-09-26 17:23:06 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Stephen Benjamin 2015-09-14 16:47:37 UTC

Description of problem:
Attempting to install or upgrade a package reports as successful even if the package was not installed.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.1.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. In the UI, on the Packages tab of a host, enter something nonsensical like "aadfjkasrghje"
2. Click Perform

Actual results:
Task succeeds, with message: "No package(s) available to install"


Expected results:
Task should fail


Additional info:

Comment 1 Stephen Benjamin 2015-09-14 16:49:00 UTC

*** Bug 1261753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Stephen Benjamin 2015-09-23 19:13:03 UTC

It appears to the same case for any failure, e.g. installing a package without a GPG key available on the host.

Comment 4 Jeff Ortel 2016-01-28 15:21:50 UTC

The information needed by katello to fix this is contained in the 'result' part of the Pulp task.

Comment 6 Ivan Necas 2016-04-25 08:50:35 UTC

*** Bug 1293984 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Ivan Necas 2016-04-25 08:56:39 UTC

*** Bug 1223029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 10 Chris Duryee 2016-09-26 17:23:06 UTC

checked against 6.2.0

When attempting to repro per #0, I got the expected error:

*:asdfasdf-*-*.*: No package(s) available to install