Bug 1263735

Summary: Could not resolve AD user from root domain
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Component: sssdAssignee: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee <kbanerje>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: apeetham, grajaiya, jgalipea, jhrozek, lslebodn, mkosek, mzidek, pbrezina, preichl, sgoveas, tlavigne
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.13.0-32.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 11:40:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Jakub Hrozek 2015-09-16 14:42:20 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2723

There are more administrator users: id ''administrator @child1.sssdad.com'' and id ''administrator @sssdad.com''.

sssd is joined to the child domain.
{{{
[sssd]
config_file_version = 2
services = nss, pam
domains = child1.sssdad.com

[nss]
default_shell = /bin/bash

[domain/child1.sssdad.com]
debug_level = 0xFFF0
id_provider = ad
ad_domain = child1.sssdad.com
cache_credentials = True
krb5_store_password_if_offline = True
use_fully_qualified_names = True
fallback_homedir = /home/%d/%u
}}}


but user from root domain ''administrator @sssdad.com'' cannot be resolved.
It might be cause by fact that user is stored in different domain
{{{
[root@ibm-x3650-03 sssd]# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/sss/db/cache_child1.sssdad.com.ldb "(name=Administrator)"
ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/ldb/modules/ldb/memberof.la : /usr/lib64/ldb/modules/ldb/memberof.la: invalid ELF header
asq: Unable to register control with rootdse!
# record 1
dn: name=Administrator,cn=users,cn=child1.sssdad.com,cn=sysdb
createTimestamp: 1437407347
fullName: Administrator
gecos: Administrator
gidNumber: 369600513
name: Administrator
objectClass: user
uidNumber: 369600500
objectSIDString: S-1-5-21-4212360905-986714573-1256250948-500
uniqueID: 16c36a5f-e2ec-49cd-a2ab-742b03d3adde
originalDN: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=child1,DC=sssdad,DC=com
originalMemberOf: CN=Group Policy Creator Owners,CN=Users,DC=child1,DC=sssdad,
 DC=com
originalMemberOf: CN=Domain Admins,CN=Users,DC=child1,DC=sssdad,DC=com
originalMemberOf: CN=Administrators,CN=Builtin,DC=child1,DC=sssdad,DC=com
originalModifyTimestamp: 20150718152922.0Z
entryUSN: 768294
adUserAccountControl: 66048
nameAlias: administrator
lastUpdate: 1437407347
dataExpireTimestamp: 1437412747
distinguishedName: name=Administrator,cn=users,cn=child1.sssdad.com,cn=sysdb

# returned 1 records
# 1 entries
# 0 referrals
}}}

Comment 2 Jakub Hrozek 2015-09-22 11:49:41 UTC
master:
    fb83de0699b16e7d8eca803305e2112795807b4c
    cf66c53e46fad46f47489f43265c58004e0e39d4
    cffe3defa3cb5011efc92a7773fe113a1e69774f
    67625b1b4f856510bf4e169649b3fb30c2c14152

Comment 4 Amith 2015-10-13 15:49:03 UTC
Verified the bug on SSSD Version: sssd-1.13.0-39.el7.x86_64

Steps followed during verification:

1. Add sssd client to child AD domain, lets say child.sssdad.com with parent as sssdad.com

2. Run getent on both the administrators, ie root domain and child domain.

3. With the latest build, root domain administrator should be resolved.

# getent passwd -s sss administrator@sssdad.com
administrator@sssdad.com:*:1239000500:1239000500:Administrator:/home/administrator@sssdad.com:/bin/bash

# getent passwd -s sss administrator@child1.sssdad.com
administrator@child1.sssdad.com:*:369600500:369600513:Administrator:/home/administrator@child1.sssdad.com:/bin/bash

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 11:40:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2355.html