Bug 1263830

Summary:	Unsubscribed Folders are listed on left-pane
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Onyeibo Oku <twohotis>
Component:	evolution	Assignee:	Milan Crha <mcrha>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	24	CC:	lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha, tpopela
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-02-28 14:58:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Onyeibo Oku 2015-09-16 20:13:58 UTC

Description of problem:
Unsubscribed Folders are listed on left pane

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.17.92-1.fc24

How reproducible:
Since latest update

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Update to 3.17.92-1.fc24
2.
3.

Actual results:
Unsubscribed Folders are listed on left pane 

Expected results:
Only subscribed folders should be visible as before

Additional info:

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2015-09-17 06:07:49 UTC

Thanks for a bug report. What is your glib version, please? I think of:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755075
which resets all the mail account settings to its defaults.

Comment 2 Onyeibo Oku 2015-09-17 08:23:52 UTC

Glib here is 2.10-46.fc23

Comment 3 Milan Crha 2015-09-22 05:19:16 UTC

(In reply to Onyeibo from comment #2)
> Glib here is 2.10-46.fc23

Oh, I forgot, despite the project is named glib, Fedora has it packaged as glib2. There is an update of the evolution-data-server 3.17.92-2, which contains a fix from the upstream bug mentioned in comment #1. There will be 3.18.0 available soon too.

Could you try to update the evolution-data-server and then restart the machine, thus the new binaries will be used also with the background processes, please?

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 15:36:28 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase