Bug 1265475
Summary: | [rfe] Implement a plugin for matching packages across distros to host distro | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> |
Component: | dnf-plugins-extras | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jkadlcik, jzeleny, packaging-team-maint, tim.lauridsen, vmukhame |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-08-10 07:03:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Neal Gompa
2015-09-23 03:28:52 UTC
It sounds like very useful plugin. Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reopened and restored state as this was a feature request... The request looks reasonable, but the price will be to high. I am not talking about requirements for development. I am talking about required additional metadata handling. I think that a better approach is to have a web service that will provide the functionality rather than a local tool for one distribution. Such a solution could be more generic therefore it might have larger community. The referenced project ('[1]: https://gitlab.com/appstream/distromatch') is not updated anymore, therefore it creates another complication. I am closing the bug report because I don't think we will implement it. |